Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52153 (AP)

A.T. Madhusudan Rao v. State of Andhra pradesh

WP/19437/2022 · 2025-09-24

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010325502022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19437/2022 Between: 1. A.T. MADHUSUDAN RAO, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 70 YEARS D. NO. 12-68, 3RD FLOOR SRIRAM NAGAR SANIVARAPUPETA ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AMARAVATHI 2. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU 3. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 4. M/S VIJAYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY KADIYALA VIJAYALAKSHMI CHOWDARY W/O. SURESH, OCC. PRINCIPAL OF JINGLE BELLS SCHOOL SRIRAMA NAGAR, 3RD ROAD, GAVARAVARAM SANIVARAPUPET PANCHAYAT, ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not following the section 456 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act for removal/demolition of the premises of D No12-68 situated at Sriram Nagar, 2 3rd road, Sanivarapeta, Eluru, as the said building is dilapidated and ruinous condition is bad and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondnet to implement of proceedings vide RC No 5340/A1/2021 dated 18-06-2022 of District Educational Officer,Eluru District, Eluru pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION 3. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP ) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19437 of 2022 ORDER: 1. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner challenged the notice under Section 456 of the Municipal Corporation Act, and pending the writ petition, the said construction was demolished. As on date, it is a vacant land. 2. It is further submitted that, pending disposal, the petitioner himself demolished the structure 3. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to initiate file fresh proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:25.09.2025 NKA 4 624 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19437 of 2022 Date: 25.09.2025 NKA