1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1015 of 2025 1 - Smt. Manorama Sharma W/o Late Bhanupratap, Aged About 69 Years R/o Ward No. 19, Sheetla, Thakur Para, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ... applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department (Wrongly Written As Department Of Public Works), Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief, Public Health Engineering Department (Wrongly Written As Department Of Public Works), Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Naya Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (Wrongly Written As Public Works Department), (E/m Sub Division), Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (Wrongly Written As Public Works Department), Division Durg, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department (Wrongly Written As Public Works Department), Division Kawardha, Tahsil And District Kabirdham (C.G.) 6 - Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.10.10 16:46:54 +0530 2 For applicant (s) : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Govt. Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on board 10.10.2025 1. It is an application for modification/ correction of the order dated 31.07.2025 passed in WPC No. 8620/2025. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that due to inadvertence and typographical mistake, instead of mentioning ‘Public Health Engineering Department’, other one ‘Public Works Department’ has been mentioned in the details of Respondent No. 1 to 5 impugned petition, as well as the order. Therefore, other department which was wrongly mentioned in the order as ‘Public Works Department’ may be substituted as ‘Public Health Engineering Department’ in the array of cause-title of the impugned petition as well as in the order dated 31.07.2025. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 4. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, this Court is of the opinion that prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant be allowed by substituting ‘Public Health Engineering Department’ in the array of cause-title of the impugned petition, as well as in the impugned order dated 31.07.2025, with respect to Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. 5. Accordingly, the present MCC is disposed of with the above modification. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Sagrika