Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52147 (AP)

K VEERA RAGHAVAMMA v. SECREATRIAT( ENDOWMENTS) AND 2 OTHERS

WP/30439/2017 · 2025-11-27

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010438142017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30439/2017 Between: 1. K VEERA RAGHAVAMMA, W/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNA RAO, AGED 83 YEARS, R/ O. VADAPALLI VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. . ...PETITIONER AND 1. SECREATRIAT ENDOWMENTS AND 2 OTHERS, (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI ANNAPURNA SAMETHA VISWESWARA SWARNY, TEMPLE VADAPALLI VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP: BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the auction notification dated: 27- 08-2017 issued by the 3rd respondent temple for conducting public auction on 11-092017 for the license hold rights to collect the coconut halves as illegal, arbitrary, void and against the principles of natural justice, violation of Articles 14 & 25 of Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the auction notification dated: 27-08-2017 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The court made the following ORDER: When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.11.2025 GVK 3 356 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.30439 of 2017 Date: 28.11.2025 GVK