Chitturi Venkata Ratnam, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2052/2021 · 2025-10-05
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52145 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52145 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010029312021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2052/2021 Between:
1. CHITTURI VENKATA RATNAM,, S/O. RAMA MURTHY, AGED 80 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-52,MAIN ROAD, PADAMATIPALEM VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. CHITTURI MURALI KRISHNA,, S/O. VENKATA RATNAM, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. D.NO. 1-51, MAIN ROAD, PADAMATIPALEM VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. CHITTURI NAGA RAMALAKSHMI,, W/O. MURALI KRISHNA, AGED 44 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1-51, MAIN ROAD, PADAMATIPALEM VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPTANAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAIKALURUCIRCLE, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIDINDI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI Y V V L NAIDU, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAIKALURU CIRCLE, KAIKALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. CHITTURI ANJANI KUMARI, W/O. LATE RAMBABU, AGED 45 YEARS, RIO. NEAR BHARAT PETROL BUNK, BANTUMILLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. CHITTURI KUMAR SAI, S/O. LATE RAMBABU, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O.
NEAR BHARAT PETROL BUNK, BANTUMILLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Police Authorities in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful life and enjoyment and harassing and confining the petitioners in the police station by saying that they will foist false cases against them as illegal and unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners peaceful life's and enjoyment by any manner.”
2. Heard Sri K.Rambabu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the crime registered against the petitioners is ended in compromise before the Lok Adalat. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.10.2025 ASR
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.2052 of 2021
Dt.06.10.2025
Asr