Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52133 (KAR)

ASHOKGOUDA W/O RAMANAGOUDA PATIL v. SMT. VIJAYALAXMI W/O SHIVARAMAPPA KULAGATTI

RSA/100131/2022 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 100131/2022 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1 . ASHOKGOUDA W/O RAMANAGOUDA PATIL AGE. 57 YEAR,S OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHIKKAKABBARA, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI 581111. AND OTHERS ... APPELLANTS (By SRI : AVINASH BANAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SMT. VIJAYALAXMI W/O SHIVARAMAPPA KULAGATTI AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. CHIKKAKABBARA, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI 581111. AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS RSA FILED U/SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.11.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.61/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI, SITTING AT RANEBENNUR, DISMISSING THE 2 APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.02.2019, PASSED IN O.S. NO.66/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, HIREKERUR, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 22.03.2025. Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100131/2022 is dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17/02/2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. C-By:-pa T- By: -ran