Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5213 (UTT)

ARUN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/105/2020 · 2025-04-29

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 105/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. M.C. Upadhyaya, Advocate, i/b Mr. A.M. Saklani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder, for the State. Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate, i/b Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the respondent no. 4. Mr. Devansh Kaushik, Advocate, i/b Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the respondent no. 5. (2) Learned Counsel for the petitioners makes a statement at the bar that the relief as sought in the writ petition do not survive anymore and the writ petition has become infructuous. (3) In view of the statement made by learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 29.4.2025 Pr