Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5213 (AP)

M/s. KPP Infra, v. Sri Pradhyumna PS, IAS,

CC/507/2024 · 2025-07-17

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010042562024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 507/2024 Between: 1. M/S. KPP INFRA,, D.NO. 23-11-4/C, SREE SAI SEETHA MANSION, FLAT NO. 104, SRIRAM NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.V. PADMANABHAM. 2. K.V. PADMANABHAM,, S/O. VEERANNA, AGED 72 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO.27-17-32, SOCIETY BUILDINGS, A.S.R. NAGAR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI PRADHYUMNA PS IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (R AND B) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. Y V KISHORE BABUJI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R 86 B DIVISION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. RESPONDENTS ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of the courts Act for willfully and wontedly violating the orders of this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.23786 OF 2023 dated 20.09.2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of order in WP No. 23786 of 2023 dated 20.07.2023 in CC.No. of 2024 in WP.No. 23786 of 2023 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased permit the petitioner implead the proposed respondent no. 4 & 5 as party respondent in the present C.C No. 507 OF 2024 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KALE VIJAYA RAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. ASHOK RAM V 3. C SUMON The Court made the following: ORDER Sri K.Divakar Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri Kale Vijaya Raju, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has been complied with and this Contempt Case may be closed. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR