The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Smt. Duleshiya Bai
MAC/1034/2016 · 2025-04-09
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5212 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5212 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1034 of 2016 The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office Shop No. 11, Mandi Complex Kanker, Tahsil And District- Kanker Chhattisgarh,.......Insurer,... Appellant (Insurer) versus 1 - Smt. Duleshiya Bai W/o Renu Nayak, Aged About 35 Years Caste- Halba, 2 - Pawan Kumar, S/o Late Renu Nayak, Aged About 16 Years Caste- Halba, 3 - Ku. Lokeshwari, D/o Late Renu Nayak, Aged About 14 Years Caste- Halba, 4 - Ku. Chandrika, D/o Late Renu Nayak, Aged About 12 Years Caste- Halba, Respondents No. 2 to 4 through natural guardian mother Smt. Duleshiya Bai. 5 - Smt. Ramsheel Bai, W/o Late Halalkhor, Aged About 65 Years Caste- Halba, All are R/o- Village- Chandeli, Tahsil- Charama, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh,.......Claimants,
6 - Bhikam Netam, S/o Faguwaram Netam, Aged About 25 Years R/o- Village- Potgaon, P.S.- Korar, District- Kanker, Chhattisgarh,.......Driver/owner, ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None appears. For Respondents 1 to 5 : Shri Amit Nayak appears on behalf of Shri Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate.
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 09/04/2025
1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called today repeatedly. Even on 29.11.2024, when the matter was listed, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. In the above circumstance and in absence of representation on behalf of the appellant, no other option is left with this Court but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE Anjani Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.04.09 16:06:34 +0530