- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13355 WP No. 103839 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103839 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. SANNMARAMMA W/O. LATE EARAPPA, AGE: 90 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDDALAPUR VILLAGE, HOSAPETE TOWN, TAL: HOSAPETE, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR-591201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001, R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TB DAM ROAD, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR TALUK, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR-583225. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TB DAM ROAD, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR TALUK, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR-583225. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13355 WP No. 103839 of 2024 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TB DAM ROAD, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR TALUK, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR-583225. 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, TB DAM ROAD, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR TALUK, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR-583225. 6. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TB DAM ROAD, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR TALUK, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR-583225. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 20/01/2024 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 IN RESPECT OF RS NO.9/1A MEASURING 48 CENTS SITUATED IN SANKALPUR VILLAGE HOSAPET TALUK, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT (OLD BALLARI DIST.) BEARING NO.KAN/PAHANI- TIDDUPADI/217/23.24 VIDE ANNEXURE-F; ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO RECTIFY THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF RS NO.9/1A MEASURING 48 CENTS SITUATED IN SANKALPURA VILLAGE HOSAPET TALUK, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT (OLD BALLARI DIST.) AS PER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29/10/2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13355 WP No. 103839 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 87