Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5211 (KAR)

MR P CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE P HANUMANTHU v. SMT SWATHI W/O MR. P CHANDRASHEKAR D/O VADDE THIMAPPA

RPFC/100093/2023 · 2025-09-19

G Basavaraja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:16184 RPFC No. 100093 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100093 OF 2023 BETWEEN: MR. P. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE P. HANUMANTHU, OCC: LECTURE RUNNING SCHOOL, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 1/3473-2, SMT COLONY, NEAR WISDOM PUBLIC SCHOOL, YEMMINGNUR TOWN AND TALUK, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518 360, ANDHRA PRADESH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y. KOTRESHA AND SRI. SANTOSH BIRANGI, ADVOCATES) AND: SMT. SWATHI W/O MR. P. CHANDRASHEKAR D/O VADDE THIMAPPA, OCC: UNEMPLOYED AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESIDENT OF K.C. ROAD, BEHIND ANDHRA BANK KATTEGUDDA, BALLARI-583 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. B.S. SANGATI, ADVOCATE) THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO A. TO ALLOW THE PRESENT REVISION PETITION. B. TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS VIDE CRL.MISC.NO.248/2022, DATED 15.10.2022 U/S 125 OF CR. P.C. SHOWN AS ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE HON’BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BALLARI. BHARATHI H M Digitally signed by BHARATHI H M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:16184 RPFC No. 100093 of 2023 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Right from 23.09.2024, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Order sheet shows that on 23.09.2024, learned counsel for the respondent is present, no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, Court has directed the matter to be listed on 27.09.2024. On 27.09.2024, none appeared on behalf of petitioner, respondent counsel is present and the matter is directed to be listed on 05.11.2024. On 05.11.2024, as there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court has directed to list the petition under the caption ‘dismissal’ on 06.11.2024. Today also there is no representation on behalf the petitioner. This Court deems that the petitioner has not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI HMB CT:BCK, LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 39