'S .H IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11450 OF 2025 Between: Daggumati Sreedhar Rao, son of Mohan Rao, age about 49 years, resident of Door No.27-2-766, Street, A.C.Nagar, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Room No.14i; Ground, Building No.2, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The. Chairman and Managing Director, APSPDCL, ITI Rd, Benz Circle, ITI Rd, Siddhartha Nagar, Benz Circle, Vijayawadd., Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintending Engineer, O/o. East-2, Mini Bypass Road, APSPDCL, Nellore City-524002 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer, O/o. East-2 Mini Bypass Road, APSPDCL, Nellore City-524002. 5. The Assistant Engineer, O/o. East-2 Mini Bypass Road, APSPDCL, Nellore City-524002 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 herein for not considering the application dated 16.04.2025 by the said authorities is illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of the M iiat^rimMirections as granted in WP.No.8921 of 2024 dated 16.05.2024, & 26.09.2024 and consequently pleased to direct the 3rd "respdnd4nt herein to consider the applications dated 2gv 16.04.2025 on its merits and further direct not to give any service connection to the subject matter of the properties of WP.No.8921 of 2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent herein to consider the petitioner's application dated 16.04.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V SURENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5: SMT. JYOTHIRATNA ANUMOLU (JR. SC FOR APSPDCL) The Court made the following: ORDER I APHC010224862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11450/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER Daggumati Sreedhar Rao AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.VSURENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following ORDER; Heard Sri V.Surendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Jyothiratna Anumolu, learned junior standing counsel for respondents 2 to 5. 2. The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents 3 to 5 in not considering the application dated 16.04.2025, as illegal and arbitrary. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner made an application to respondents 3 to 5 not to accord any power connection/ service connection in respect of the property in Sy.No.809A (old Sy.No.869) and Sy.Nos.808, Nellore Bit-ll, Near Children’s Park, Nellore City. However, 3. 2 without considering the said representation, the 3 to 5 respondents are contemplating releasing the power connection. Learned standing counsel submitted written instructions of the Assistant Executive Engineer. The written instructions read as follows; 4. “It is to submit that the no new service connections were given by this office in the land of petitioner. Further it is to submit that no one has applied for new service in the premises of petitioner’s land. Requesting not to issue any new service connections in his properties already filed W.P.No.8921 of 2024 and the hon’ble court has given directions. Based on the directions this office has not given any new service connection on the above petitioner’s property premises” Given the above instructions, the grievance of the petitioner that the authorities intend to give a new service connection to the aforementioned property is misconceived. No further adjudication is required in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. 6. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// IT SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri V Surendra Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Energy, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. One CC to Smt. Jyothi Ratna Anumolu, Jr. SC for APSPDCL, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11450of 2025 g 2IJUN2(P5 g . Curreni section M;^PATCVV«' ■p CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS