APHC010522022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26811/2025 Between: 1. VAJRALA CHANDRAMOULI REDDY,, S/O. V SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O. HOUSE NO. 15-6-94, REDLA BAZAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, A.P. POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OLD GUNTUR POLICE STATION OLD GUNTUR, 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ, order or direction directing the respondents to direct the respondents to produce the detenu (my son), Sri Vajrala Tharaka Pratap Reddy, House No. 15-6-94, Redia Bazar, Old Guntur, Guntur District, before this Hon'ble Court and to set him at liberty forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble Justice Sri R.Raghunandana Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order of remand passed by the Magistrate is not in accordance with law and has been passed without considering all the provisions of law in a proper light. Learned counsel for the petitioner presses for a hearing in the present writ petition. 2. As an order of remand has already been passed by the Magistrate, it would be appropriate to relegate the petitioner / detenu for invoking appropriate remedy under law. 3. In the circumstances, this Writ Petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to exercise his rights in accordance with law against the order of remand as well as such other proceedings initiated against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 07.10.2025 KA 4 178 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26811/2025 Date: 07.10.2025 KA