SCREENING/SELECTION COMMITTEE AND ANR v. DR BAPAN KALITA AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/48/2025 · 2025-01-19
Michael Zothankhuma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5210 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5210 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010000562025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/48/2025 SCREENING/SELECTION COMMITTEE AND ANR CONSTITUTED FOR THE BHAWANIPUR ANCHALIK COLLEGE FOR SHORT LISTING CANDIDATES FOR THE POST OF PRINCIPAL IN BHAWANIPUR ANCHALIK COLLEGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT OF GOVERNING BODY , BHAWANIPUR ANCHALIK COLLEGE, BARPETA VERSUS DR BAPAN KALITA AND ORS S/O LATE BIPIN CH. KALITA, R/O VILL- BARIMUKH, P.O.-BARIMUKH, P.S.- MUSHALPUR, DIST- BAKSA, BTR (ASSAM), PIN-781372 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 4:GOVERNING BODY OF THE BHAWANPUR ANCHALIK COLLEGE REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT OF GOVERNING BODY BHAWANIPUR ANCHALIK COLLEGE BARPETA 5:THE VICE-CHANCELLOR BHATTADEV UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR BHATTADEV UNIVERSITY
Page No.# 2/3 BAJALI PIN-781325 6:UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI-11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R SINGHA, MS S PATOWARY,MR R SINGHA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A BORUA, SC, EDU
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 20.01.2025
Mr. R.Singha, learned counsel for the applicant submits that as this court had allowed the writ petitioner to appear in the selection process by way of an interim order and as such, the writ petitioner had participated in the selection process. He submits that as the selection process is over, the applicant may be allowed to publish the result of the selection process for the post of Principal. Mr. A.Baruah, learned counsel for the opposite parties has got no objection on the prayer made by the applicant counsel. In view of the above submission, the applicant is allowed to publish the result of the selection process. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE
Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant