TINNAVALLI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15572/2023 · 2025-12-21
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52097 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52097 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010303092023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15572/2023 Between:
1. TINNAVALLI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. RANGA RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
R/O. D.NO.4- 136,MALLAVOLU VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, . MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. S V SAILAJA, W/O. S.V.S SAI PRASAD, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. 10- 225,BALARAMUNIPET,
MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. SRI MAGANTISRIMANARAYANA, S/O.GOPALARAO, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O.
D.NO.3/97, GUDURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to dispossess the Petitioner's property in respect of the land property of Ac.0-47 cents out of Ac. 1- 01 cents in R.S No. 86/3 situated in RamarajuPalem Village, within the RamarajuPalemPanchayat Area, Guduru Mandal, Krishna Districtis illegal, arbitrary in violation the principles of natural justice in Article, 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and against all settled principles of lawand consequently direct the Respondents not to
2 dispossess the Petitioner without following due process of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner from the subject property i.e., Ac.0-47 cents out of Ac. 1-01 cents in R.S No. 86/3 situated in RamarajuPalem Village, within the RamarajuPalemPanchayat Area, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2.
MUTYALA SOBHANADRI NAIDU The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15572 of 2023
ORDER:
Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 22.12.2025
KBN
4
27 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 15572 of 2023
Date: 22.12.2025
KBN