Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52093 (AP)

SAYYAD SUBHAN SAHEB v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/26617/2023 · 2025-11-24

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010511442023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 26617/2023 Between: 1. SAYYAD SUBHAN SAHEB, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O. S. MAHABOOB SAHEB, R/O. NEW BUILDINGS, REMATA VILLAGE KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE,,AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 5. THE REMATA GRAMA PANCHAYATI, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, REMATA VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT. 6. THE SARPANCH, , REMATA VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT 7. S, S 8. THE TAHSILDHAR, KURNOOL MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be raised at the time of hearing, it is prayed that this Honourable court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents, in not stopping the illegal and unauthorised construction of a building adjacent to the Idgah situated at Sy. Nos. 333 and 342 of Remata Village, Kurnool Mandal and District as arbitrary, illegal, borne out of non-application of mind, contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and the rules made thereunder and violative of Article 25 of the Indian Constitution. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to stop the illegal and unauthorized construction of a building adjacent to the Idgah situated at Sy. Nos.333 and 342 of Remata Village, Kurnool Mandal and District during the pendency of the present writ petition. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Varun Byreddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and there remains nothing for adjudication. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25th November, 2025 RKS