Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5209 (JHR)

YADUNANDAN DEO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/671/2025 · 2025-04-02

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:10195 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 671 of 2025 Yadunandan Deo, S/o Late Mato Deo, R/o Village-Tabhaghat, PO & PS-Jasidih, District-Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar… … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kr Deo, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Nirupama, AC to Sr. SC-II ----- 04/02.04.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 2 to provide certified copies of five khatiyans of the lands appertaining to Mouza-Tabhaghat No. 208, Jamabandi Nos. 67, 68, 69, 84 & 83, Mouza-Sagdaha No. 207, Jamabandi Nos. 57 & 45, Mouza-Basmandih No. 228, Jamabandi No. 22, Mouza-Deopur No. 227, Jamabandi Nos. 39, 40 & 45 and Mouza-Sarsa No. 226, Jamabandi Nos. 116 & 95/2 which, according to the petitioner, belong to him and are required to be produced in Title (Partition) Suit No. 45/2023 for partition amongst his family members (co-sharers). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite various representations made by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2 – the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, no action has been taken by the said respondent in this regard, which has compelled him to prefer the present writ petition. 3. Mrs. Nirupama, AC to Sr. SC-II appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that if the petitioner prefers a fresh representation in this regard before the respondent no. 2, an appropriate decision/step will be taken by the said respondent 2025:JHHC:10195 2 within a timeframe. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of prayer made in the writ petition, without entering into merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to prefer a fresh representation on the present issue before the respondent no. 2. On receipt of the said representation, the respondent no. 2 shall take an appropriate decision/step in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of filing of the representation. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid liberty and direction. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish