Vinay Kumar @ Mantus Prasad @ Matu Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./45817/2025 · 2025-07-28
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52088 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52088 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45817 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-528 Year-2024 Thana- DHANARUA District- Patna ====================================================== Vinay Kumar @ Mantus Prasad @ Matu Kumar S/o Late Ramanand Singh R/o Lachhu BIgha, P.S.- Dhanarua, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Jiban Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 103(1), 352 and 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 06.09.2024 at about 08:00 AM, due to dispute with regard to drainage of water, all the FIR named accused persons, armed with lathi and danda, came at the house of the informant and assaulted the informant. When his mother came to his rescue, the petitioner with an intention to kill assaulted on her temple by means of lathi due to which she died on the spot.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45817 of 2025(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent has falsely been implicated in the present case. The present case is the counter blast of Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 538 of 2024. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the bail petition and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner that he, with an intention to kill, assaulted the mother of informant on her temple by means of lathi due to which she died on the spot.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the specific and heinous nature of allegation levelled in the FIR against the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.
Shahnawaz/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T