Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52081 (PNJ)

M/S GODWIN INC AND OTHERS v. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND OTHERS

CWP/12127/2025 · 2025-05-05

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-12127-2025 (O&M) 136 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/s Godwin Inc. and others Haryana State Industrial and others CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr Mr. Ankur Mittal, SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of 22.11.2012 (Annexure P letter dated 27.06.2013 (Annexure P 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners confines his representations (Annexure P-20) 3. On learned counsel representations dated 20.05.2022 (Annexure P 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: M/s Godwin Inc. and others versus Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. S.P. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for the respondents. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned resumption order dated 22.11.2012 (Annexure P-12) and decision of respondent No.2 conveyed vide letter dated 27.06.2013 (Annexure P-14). After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners prayer to the limited extent of representations dated 20.05.2022 (Annexure P 20) by respondent No.3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned counsel for the respondents appear representations dated 20.05.2022 (Annexure P 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12127-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: May 05, 2025 ….Petitioners and Infrastructure Development Corporation ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN the petitioners. Advocate for the respondents. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ Certiorari for quashing the impugned resumption order dated 12) and decision of respondent No.2 conveyed vide After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners limited extent of deciding the pending 20.05.2022 (Annexure P-19) and dated 08.12.2023 on advance service of copy of petition, appears and submits that pending representations dated 20.05.2022 (Annexure P-19) and dated 08.12.2023 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 s s Writ Certiorari for quashing the impugned resumption order dated 12) and decision of respondent No.2 conveyed vide After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners pending 08.12.2023 on advance service of copy of petition, pending 19) and dated 08.12.2023 MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-12127-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 (Annexure P-20) will be looked into by respondent No.5 and it shall take decision either way, on such representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 to consider the pending representations dated 20.05.2022 (Annexure P-19) and dated 08.12.2023 (Annexure P-20) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 05, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.12 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment