Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52081 (AP)

APPINEDI POTHURAJU v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

WP/2191/2021 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010031512021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2191 OF 2021 Between: 1. APPINEDI POTHURAJU, S/o Purnachandra Rao Aged about 41yrs, Occ. Teacher R/o D.No.16/309-1A Near Rathnam High School Machavaram, Machilipatnam Krishna District ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, Pedana police station Krishna District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District 4. Meharunnisa Begum, W/o Shareef Inayathul Rehman Aged about 65yrs, R/o H.No.8-23-25, Seetarama Residency 1st Lane, Seetha Nagar Guntur ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: P SRILATHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2191 of 2021 ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 in respect of the land admeasuring 310.25 Sq.Yds situated in R.S.R.No.671/ lA of Pedana village and mandal, Krishna District without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, beyond jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent No.4 in respect of the land extent 310.25 Sq.Yds situated in R.S.R.No.671/ 1A of Pedana village and mandal, Krishna District without following due process of law...” 2. Heard Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents would submit that police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties. 4. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute, except under due process of law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025 Dvs THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 241 WRIT PETITION NO: 2191 of 2021 Date: 08.10.2025 Dvs