Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52080 (KAR)

MAHESH BERAGUD v. SUNITA W/O MAHESH BERAGUD

MFA/105040/2023 · 2025-09-22

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12836-DB MFA No. 105040 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 105040 OF 2023 (FC) BETWEEN: MAHESH BERAGUD AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. #18, BEHIND SHUBHA BHUMI APARTMENT, LINGARAJ NAGARA HUBLI, NEAR SAMUDAI BHAVAN, HUBLI-580031. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KUSHAL V. BOLMAL, ADVOCATE) AND: SUNITA W/O MAHESH BERAGUD D/O HANUMANTAPPA BHAJANTRI 3RD WARD, NEAR HULIGAMMA TEMPLE, BUDUGUMPA-583229, TALUK. KARATAGI, DIST. KOPPAL. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.B. SHIVAKUMAR AND SRI. SANTOSH BIRANAGI, ADVOCATES) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.09.2023, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.24/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT HUBBALLI, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/SEC. 13 (1) (ia) (ib) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT & ETC. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12836-DB MFA No. 105040 of 2023 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. Memo reads as under; “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner herein has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 23.09.2023 in MC-24/2023 passed by the Judge Family Court, HUBBALLI. Meanwhile, the intervention of the elder has led to the compromise and the petitioner and respondent have filed in MC 382/2025 filed for mutual consent concluded on 25.07.2025. Wherein the petitioner has paid Rs.19,00,000/- as permanent alimony, Thus being the fact, the petitioner is not willing to continue the present petition and intends to withdraw the same as not pressed. Hence, the petition be dismissed as withdrawn.” In view of the said memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE PJ, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50