Kankanala Venkateswarlu, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10867/2020 · 2025-09-17
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52080 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52080 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010172032020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10867/2020 Between:
1. KANKANALA VENKATESWARLU,, S/O.RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND COOLIE, R/O.AMBEDKARNAGAR, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, . SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. KANKANALA ASHIRVADAM,, S/O.ADI SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND COOLIE, R/O.AMBEDKARNAGAR, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. BOMMALA SINGAIAH,, S/O.SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND COOLIE, R/O.AMBEDKARNAGAR, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. KANKANALA ABRAHAM,, S/O.ATCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND COOLIE, R/O.AMBEDKARNAGAR, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. KANKANALA VENKATA RAO,, S/O.ATCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND COOLIE, R/O.AMBEDKARNAGAR, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. CHINTHA MALLESWARI,, W/O. SOLOMON RAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION AND COOLIE, R/O.AMBEDKARNAGAR, MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL,
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.10867 of 2020
PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE REVENUE DIVISION, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PTSKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.10867 of 2020
The Court made the following Order:
No representation for the petitioners. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in interfering into the petitioners’ peaceful possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land in an extent of Ac.0.72 cents of each of the petitioner's in Survey Number 227 of Mangamuru Revenue village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District for the allotment of house site pattas to the weaker section peoples under the “Navaratnalu Pedlandariki Illu” scheme. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent submits that it is a Government Poramboke Pond. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated.
There shall be no order as to costs. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.10867 of 2020
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
18.09.2025 PGT