Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5208 (CHH)

JEENAT KHAN v. JUNAID KHAN

CRR/168/2020 · 2025-09-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45854 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 168 of 2020 1 - Jeenat Khan W/o Junaid Khan, Aged About 29 Years R/o Through Rafiuqe Qureshi Taiba Chowk, Talapara, Thana Civil Line Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Faizal Khan S/o Junaid Khan, Aged About 7 Years Through Natural Guardian Mother Jeenat Khan, R/o Through Rafiuqe Qureshi Taiba Chowk, Talapara, Thana Civil Line Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ku. Iqra Khan, D/o Junaid Khan Aged About 3 Years Through Natural Guardian Mother Jeenat Khan, R/o Through Rafiuqe Qureshi Taiba Chowk, Talapara, Thana Civil Line Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh .. Applicant(s) versus Junaid Khan S/o Late Saleem Khan, Aged About 32 Years R/o In Front Of Kachhari Sarangarh, Police Station Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. Presently Posted- As Peon At Agricultural Produce Market, Gandai, Chhui Khadan, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : None. For Non-applicant : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 09.09 .2025 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicants to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. By way of this revision, the applicants have prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to enhance the maintenance ordered by the learned Family Court by order dated 30.11.2019 to the tune of Rs. 15000/- per month in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicants have lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal