- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12331 RFA No. 100515 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100515 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ-) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BASAVANNEPPA S/O RAJAPPA HOSAMANI, AGE.71 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE 2. SRI VEERABHADRAPPA S/O RAJAPPA HOSAMANI AGE.68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE 3. SMT. SHANTAVVA W/O YALLAPPA KUSUGAL AGE.62 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD 4. SRI. MAHADEVAPPA S/O RAJAPPA HOSAMNI AGE.62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE 5. SMT. SAVITRAVVA W/O SHANKRAPPA KUSUGAL AGE.60 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD ALL ARE R/O. SURASHETTIKOPPA TQ. KALAGHATAGI, DIST.DHARWAD. ALL ARE REP THEIR GPA HOLDER BASAVANNEPPA S/O RAJAPPA HOSAMANI I.E., APPELLANT NO.1. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIJAY M MALALI, ADV) AND: 1. SRI. SHIVALINGAPPA S/O RACHAPPA DHARWAD AGE.74 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12331 RFA No. 100515 of 2022 2. SRI. VEERABHADRAPPA S/O SHIVALINGAPPA HOSAMANI AGE.53 YEARS, 3. SRI. ESHWARAPPA S/O SHIVALINGAPPA HOSAMANI AGE.50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE ALL ARE R/O. PARASAPURA TQ.KALAGHATAGI, DIST.DHARWAD. 4. SMT. NINGAVVA W/O MAHADEVAPPA BELAVATAGI, AGE. 66 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. SURASHETTIKOPPA TQ. KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.07.2018 PASSED IN O.S. NO.35/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, KALAGHATAGI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ORDER WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) This appeal is filed in the year 2022. Despite grant of sufficient opportunities, the appellants have not complied with the office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12331 RFA No. 100515 of 2022 The matter was listed on 01.9.2025. As none appeared for appellants, finally, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, it was ordered that the appeal shall be listed today for dismissal. Even today, when the case is called out, none appears for the appellants. The appeal is of the year 2022. It seems that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of the peremptory order, this appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE kmv CT: BSB