- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15010 MFA.CROB No. 100019 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MFA CROSS OBJ NO. 100019 OF 2025 (WC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHIVAMMA W/O. BHEEMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWORK, 2. MUTTANNA S/O. BHEEMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, 3. ADEMMA D/O. BHEEMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC: NIL, 4. MANJUNATH S/O. BHEEMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KARATAGI, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL. …OBJECTORS (BY SRI. B. SHARANABASAWA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SRI. LAKSHMI INDUSTRIES RICE MILL, THROUGH ITS PARTNERS, A. SRI. VEERABADRAPPA B. CHINIVAL, S/O. SRI. BASAPPA B. CHINIVAL, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15010 MFA.CROB No. 100019 of 2025 B. VEERESHAPPA V. CHINIVAL, S/O. SRI. VEERABADRAPPA V. CHINIVAL, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, C. BASANNA B. CHINIVAL, S/O. SRI. BASAPPA CHINIVAL, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O. KARATAGI, TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL-583 201. 4. THE UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, BRANCH OFFICE, SANMAN TOURIST COMPLEX, CBS CIRCLE, KUSTAGI ROAD, GANGAVATHI-583 201. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA.CROB IN MFA NO.104105/2019 FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC READ WITH SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CROSS OBJECTION AND CONSEQUENTLY MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.08.2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND WORKMENS COMPENSATION AT: GANGAVATHI IN W.C. NO.3/2016 BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED IN CLAIM PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS MFA CROB. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15010 MFA.CROB No. 100019 of 2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) The appeal was filed in the month of February 2025 and till now, office objections are not complied. This Court does not find any grounds to grant further time. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VMB CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6