Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52051 (PNJ)

KOTAK SECURITIES LTD. AND ORS. v. DEEPAKJYOT SINGH

CR/3156/2024 · 2025-09-09

Deepak Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (300) Kotak Securities Ltd. & others Deepakjyot Singh CORAM : Present: DEEPAK GUPTA the position on the last date of hearing and an adjournment slip had been circulated. Today, neither nor anybody has put in appearance on the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. 2. non-prosecution. September 9, 2025 sailesh Whether speaking/reasoned : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kotak Securities Ltd. & others Versus Deepakjyot Singh CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEEPAK None for the petitioners. Mr.Rajinder Sharma, Advocate Mr.Sahil Khunger, Advocate, for the respondent. DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing and an adjournment slip had been circulated. Today, neither any written request for adjournment has been made nor anybody has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for prosecution. September 9, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3156-2024 Decided on : 09.09.2025 ……Petitioners Versus ……Respondent DEEPAK GUPTA Mr.Rajinder Sharma, Advocate Mr.Sahil Khunger, Advocate, for the respondent. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing and an adjournment slip had been written request for adjournment has been made behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing and an adjournment slip had been written request for adjournment has been made behalf of the petitioners. It seems that In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for SAILESH RANJAN 2025.09.09 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document