Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5205 (JHR)

MEHBOOB ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1344/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:19607] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1344 of 2025 Mehboob Ansari, aged about 38 years, S/O -Late Sultan Ansari, R/O Village-Kashitanr, P.O+,P.S. - Karmatand, District - Jamtara. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan , Adv. For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl. PP. 04 / 17.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 registered under Section 111 (2) (ii), 317 (2), 317 (4), 317 (5), 318 (4), 319 (2), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (B) (C) (D) of the Information Technology Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has defrauded the victim namely Rajoli to the tune of Rs. 19,118/-, Lakhwath Vignesh to the tune of Rs. 38,587/- and Meghana K.S. to the tune of Rs. 60,231/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.12.2024 , as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes to transfer Rs. 19,118/- to the bank account of Rajoli , Rs. 38,587/- to the bank account of Lakhwath Vignesh and Rs. 60,231/- to the bank account of Meghana K.S. without prejudice to his defence in this case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail showing the proof that the petitioner has transferred Rs. 19,118/- to the bank account of Rajoli , Rs. 38,587/- to the bank account of Lakhwath Vignesh and Rs. 60,231/- to the bank account of Meghana K.S. without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.77 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-