Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:16988-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 100 of 2020. Decided on : 30.05.2025 Sh. Krishan Lal. …Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : None. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) As per report of the Registry, respondents No.5 to 7 have been served but none has put in appearance on behalf of the said respondents.
2. This case was called in the pre-lunch session as well as in the post lunch session but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default, for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:16988-DB accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
May 30, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)