Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52049 (DEL)

PRITY ARORA v. THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS.

W.P.(C)/3472/2023 · 2025-12-12

Avneesh Jhingan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~62 to 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (62) + W.P.(C) 3469/2023, CM APPL. 13457/2023 & CM APPL. 44344/2023 VANDANA YADAV .....Petitioner Through: None versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Advs. for DOE. Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr. Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4. (63) + W.P.(C) 3472/2023, CM APPL. 13471/2023 & CM APPL. 43271/2023 PRITY ARORA .....Petitioner Through: None versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Advs. for DOE. Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr. Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4. (64) + W.P.(C) 3473/2023, CM APPL. 13476/2023 & CM APPL. 44623/2023 POONAM .....Petitioner Through: None This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2025 at 12:45:03 versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Arpita Goyal & Ms. Vishruti Pandey, Advs. for DOE. Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr. Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4. (65) + W.P.(C) 3474/2023, CM APPL. 13478/2023 & CM APPL. 43212/2023 SARIKA DABAS .....Petitioner Through: None versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Somnath Bhattacharya & Mr. Pradeep Tripathi Advs. for R- 2 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN O R D E R % 12.12.2025 1. This writ petition is filed seeking direction to change the inquiry officer. 2. On 02.12.2025, the petitioner remained unrepresented inspite of two passovers. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the inquiry proceedings were concluded during the pendency of the petition and the services of the petitioner have been terminated. 3. The petitioner remained unrepresented on previous dates. 4. Today the Court is apprised that the termination order has been challenged by filing an appeal. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2025 at 12:45:03 5. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the petition in case the cause of action still survives. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J DECEMBER 12, 2025/’JK’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2025 at 12:45:03