Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52030 (PAT)

Md. Mahtab v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./38651/2025 · 2025-09-03

Harish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38651 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2024 Thana- Manikpur District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Md. Mahtab Son of Md. Yayaiv Resident of village - Haldi, P.S.- Manikpur, District - Lakhisarai. 2. Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Son of Naresh Tanti Resident of village - Haldi, P.S.- Manikpur, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 03-09-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 75, 77, 78, 79, 352, 3(5) of the BNS. 3. The allegation against the petitioners is of misbehaving with the informant and using vulgar language, apart from showing indecent gestures. 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that in fact the petitioners are labourers and during construction work going in the school, there was some altercation with the informant and one school teacher namely, Md. Jahangir, who Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38651 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/3 used to throw the unused food in the pit which was captured in the mobile of the informant and since the co-accused Md. Jahangir and the petitioners pressurized to delete the video, the present FIR came to be instituted. The aforesaid facts have also come during the course of investigation in para-6 and 7 of the case diary. It is the contention of the petitioners that in fact no such occurrence has taken place but only with a view to wreak vengeance and put pressure upon the petitioners, the present FIR came to be instituted. The petitioners bear fair antecedent. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of the materials collected during the course of investigation, coupled with the fair antecedent, let the petitioners abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 107 of 2024, subject to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38651 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 3/3 conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners. Anjani/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T