110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4755-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2025 Shinder Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. G.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab. ******* HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Present criminal writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the hands of private respondents. 2. Learned State counsel, at the very outset, on instructions from ASI Jasmail Singh, submits that nothing survives in the present petition. Initially, a complaint was made by respondent No.4 before the jurisdictional police authorities at Barnala and thereafter, a compromise was effected between the parties. As such, the petitioner is not required in any manner. Further, the VISHNU 2025.07.15 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-4755-2025 (O&M) -2- representation dated 28.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mansa against respondents No.4 to 7 has also been inquired into and allegations made therein are found to be false. It is further submitted that currently, son of the petitioner and daughter of respondent No.4 are residing in British Columbia, Canada and a matrimonial dispute is going on between them. As such, no further intervention in the matter by this Court is warranted. 3. In view of the specific stand taken by learned State counsel, present petition is disposed of. [ HARPREET SINGH BRAR ] 15.07.2025 JUDGE vishnu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHNU 2025.07.15 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh