Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52021 (KAR)

SHRI AMOL S/O. AMBAMATH BASANAM v. TAHASILDAR BELGAUM

WP/107040/2023 · 2025-09-25

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13308 WP No. 107040 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 107040 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI AMOL S/O. AMBAMATH BASANAM AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. C/O. A 5 RAGHUNATH, BUNGLOW, RAJSHREE SHAHU SOCIETY, PUNE CITY MARKET YARD PUNE, MAHARASHTRA PIN CODE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHANTESH S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: TAHASILDAR BELGAUM BELGAUM PIN CODE …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO KINDLY ALLOW THE PETITION AND KINDLY ISSUE A DIRECTION IN WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS VIDE ANNEXURE-E DATED ON 26/4/2023, FURTHER DIRECTION MAY KINDLY BE GIVEN TO THE RESPONDENT TO INSERT THE NAME OF THE PRESENT PETITIONER & ETC. THIS WP COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13308 WP No. 107040 of 2023 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 08.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH, CT:VP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 38