Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5202 (JK)

SURINDR SHARMA v. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH. SECRETARY HOME DEPTT. AND ORS.

WP(C)/3336/2019 · 2025-08-28

Vinod Chatterji Koul

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No. 44 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 3336/2019 Surinder Sharma …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- None. V/s State of J&K and Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER 28.08.2025 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on two previous consecutive hearings. Same is the position today as well. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to pursue the instant petition. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed in default for appearance and for non-prosecution along with connected applications. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Vinod Chatterji Koul) Judge Jammu: 28.08.2025 JAVID IQBAL