PRASHANT @ BUNTY SUNIL SATWALE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO, PS, OLD CITY, AKOLA, DIST. AKOLA
BA/732/2025 · 2025-09-24
Vrushali V Joshi
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52019 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52019 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 1 21-ba-732-25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION(BA) NO. 732 OF 2025 Prashant @ Bunty Sunil Satwale Vs. State of Maharashtra ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.S.V.Sirpurkar, counsel for the applicant. Mr.C.A.Lokhande, APP for the State. Mr.Shantanu Taywade, appointed counsel for non-applicant No.2.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 24/09/2025
1. After hearing the parties and perusing the record, when the disinclination to grant the bail was shown, the
learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court after receiving the forensic report about the mobile.
2. Permission is granted.
3. The criminal application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Fees of the appointed counsel be quantified as per rules.
JUDGE Kavita