Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52019 (AP)

M HIMAKAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/3680/2019 · 2025-11-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010083922019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3680/2019 Between: 1. M HIMAKAR, S/O. BASAVA NAGRIUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O. PATUMIDI VILLAGE, BANTUMIIII MANDAI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPOTHAM, KRISBINA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, , CUM CONVENER OF FRESH WATER AQUACULTURE DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE (DLC), MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDIVACIA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANTUMILLI POLICE STATION, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 to 6 in not providing protection for digging the Fresh Water Aquaculture Farm in lands pursuant to the orders of 2nd respondent vide. Registration No.PRF011800034219 dt.20.07.2018 is arbitrary, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.7 dt.16.03.2013 R/w G.O.Ms.15 dt. 26.05.2015 and also contrary to all cannons of law and also offends Arts 14,19 and 21 of the constitution of India in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.to 6. to provide police protection for digging the Fresh Water Aquaculture Farm in the lands specified in the orders vide. Registration No. PRF011800034219 dt:20.07.2018 pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DHARMAVARAM CHENNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3680 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.4 to 6 in not providing protection for digging the Fresh Water Aquaculture Farm in lands pursuant to the orders of 2nd respondent vide. Registration No. PRF011800034219 dt.20.07.2018 is arbitrary, contrary to G.O.Ms.No.7 dt.16.03.2013 R/w G.O.Ms.15, dt.26.05.2015 and also contrary to all cannons of law and also offends Arts 14,19 and 21 of the constitution of India in the interest of justice and to pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioner. 3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 14.11.2025 Pmk 4 22 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3680 OF 2019 Date: 14.11.2025 Pmk