Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52017 (AP)

THE STATE OF A.P.,,MEDICAL,HYD.,& 3 OTRS. v. DR.K. SWARNA MUKHI, KURNOOL DIST., & 2 OTRS.

WP/9152/2014 · 2025-11-23

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010682622014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NOs: 9152 & 9153 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION No.9152/2014 Between: 1. THE STATE OF A.P.,,MEDICAL,HYD.,& 3 OTRS., HEALTH MEDICAL & FAMILY WELFARE, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPT.,, GOVT., OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL, DIST. 4. THE MEDICAL OFFICER, PHC., YALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT., - ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DR K SWARNA MUKHI KURNOOL DIST 2 OTRS, P.H.C. YALLUR, R/O. MIG NO.9, NGOS, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. THE A P ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL REP, BY ITS REGISTRAR, PURANI HAVELI, HYDERABAD. 3. THE ACCOUNTATNT GENERAL A P SAIFABAD HYDERABAD, - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one 2 in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI and call for the records relating to and connected with O.A.No.3826 of 2012 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, and to quash or set aside the order dated.04-06-2012 in O.A.No.3826 of 2012 by holding as erroneous and to the law IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 11436 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders dated.04-06-2012 in O.A.No.3826 of 2012 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. IN WRIT PETITION NO: 9153/2014 Between: 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH MEDICAL & FAMILY WELFARE, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH,, GOVT., OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE A.P.,, VAIDYA VIDHANA PARISHAD KOTI, REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER KOTI, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER,, W.G., DIST., ELURU. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. S ANAND KUMAR, S/O. MURALIDHRA RAO, WORKING AS DY. CIVIL SURGEON, COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, BHIMAVARAM, R/O. D.NO.1-4 -14/A, SURYANARAYANAPURAM, BHIMAVARAM-2, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.. 3 2. THE A P ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, PURANI HAVELI, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI and call for the records relating to and connected with O.A.No. 9070 of 2010 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal; Hyderabad, and to quash or set aside the order dated.06-06-2012 in 0.A.No.9070 _of 2010 by holding as erroneous and to the law and to pass such other-order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 11437 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders dated.06-06-2012 in 0.A.No.9070 of 2010 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P VEERABHADRA REDDY 4 The Court made the following COMMON ORDER: (Per Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) When the matters are taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that the orders of the Tribunal are complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents also on instructions, submits that the orders of the Tribunal are complied with and nothing is required to be adjudicated in these writ petitions. 3. Therefore, recording the aforesaid submissions made by both the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents, these Writ Petition are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY _____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 24.11.2025 KA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NOs: 9152 & 9153 OF 2014 Date: 24.11.2025 KA