RAKHVIR KAUR AND ANOTHER v. KUMAR RAHUL AND OTHERS
COCP/2274/2025 · 2025-05-12
Suvir Sehgal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52009 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52009 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (104)
COCP-2274-2025 Date of decision:- 12.05.2025
Rakhvir Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus Sh. Kumar Rahul and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Sandeep Kumar Tada, Advocate, for the petitioners.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
1. Petitioner has approached this Court alleging violation of direction dated 29.11.2024, Annexure P-1, passed by the Writ Court in CWP-19529-
2020.
2. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondents.
3. Mr. Kanav Singla, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, has placed on record a copy of the office order No.Establishment-9(3)/Punjab/2025/1835, dated 02.04.2025, to submit that both the petitioners have been granted 10 marks for experience by the Directorate, Health Services (Family Welfare), Department of Health & Family Welfare, Punjab, Chandigarh. He has categoric instructions to state that despite grant of 10 marks for experience, petitioners do not fall in the merit.
4. As order, Annexure P-1, has been complied with, no contempt is made out.
5. Contempt petition is dismissed.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
JUDGE 12.05.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.05.13 15:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment