Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52009 (BOM)

DNYANESHWAR @LALYA BANDU ONKAR SHELKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO, PS, BALAPUR DIST. AKOLA AND ANOTHER

APEAL/374/2024 · 2025-01-09

Shri G A Sanap

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 51-apeal-374-24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Appeal (APEAL) No. 374 of 2024 Dnyaneshwar @ Lalya Bandu Onkar Shelke Versus The State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Balapur, District Akola and another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri S.V.Sirpurkar, Advocate for the applicant. Shri U.R.Phasate, APP for the respondent/State. Shri Vinay Sharma, appointed Advocate for the respondent no.2. CORAM : G.A.SANAP, J. DATED : 9th JANUARY, 2025. Learned advocate for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Learned advocate for the appellant submits that the trial Judge, considering the peculiar facts, may be directed to dispose of the case expeditiously. 2. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Learned Judge is directed to dispose of the case as expeditiously and in any case, within six months. 4. Liberty is granted to file appeal, if there is no substantial progress in the trial. SKNair 2 51-apeal-374-24.odt 5. The fees of the learned counsel appointed for respondent no.2 be quantified as per rules. [G.A.SANAP, J.] SKNair