Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52005 (AP)

D SUMAN v. SRI VENKATESHWARA BHAKTHI CHANNEL TTD., CHI., & ANOTHER,

WP/23854/2017 · 2025-12-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010136702017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23854/2017 Between: 1. D SUMAN, AGED 53 YEARS OCC: SENIOR PRODUCER (UNDER REMOVAL) TTD SVBC CHANNEL, R/O H. NO. 2-2-1130/1, YEDAVALLI MANSION, NEW NALLAKUNTA, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VENKATESHWARA BHAKTHI CHANNEL TTD CHI ANOTHER, TTD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT ALIPIRI, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER,(E.0) TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ or direction preferably Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in S2/5081/CV AND amp SO/2017 dt.10-7-2017 issued by the respondent no.1 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, without authority and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Art.14 and 21 of Constitution of India ,nd consequently set aside the said proceedings, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 4199/K UDAYA SRI 2 2. NVS PRASADA VARMA 3. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO The court made the following ORDER:- Sri Shaik Rafi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the letter dated 07.03.2025 issued by the Officer on Duty (OSD), S.V. Bhakti Channel TTD, to the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents TTD, is present. 3. Permission as sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner is accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 31.12.2025 GVK 3 14 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.23854 of 2017 Date: 31.12.2025 GVK