1 / 4 2025:CGHC:49957 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11669 of 2025 1 - Rameshwar Singh Porte S/o Karam Singh Porte Aged About 52 Years Working As Assistant Teacher ( L.B. ). At Govt. Primary School Sohargadai, Block- Premnagar, Distt- Surajpur ( C.G. ). 2 - Tejbali Singh S/o Ram Bharos Aged About 36 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Lalipara Namna, Block- Premnagar, Distt- Surajpur ( C.G. ). 3 - Kameshwar Prasad Kushwaha S/o Dharmjeet Kushwaha Aged About 49 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher ( LB ) At Govt. Primary School Khadgawaan, Block- Bhaiyathan, Distt- Surajpur, ( C.G. ). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary, School Education, Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its- Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.10.09 19:14:20 +0530 2 / 4 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District- Raipur ( C.G. ). 4 - Joint Director Surguja, Education Division Surguja ( C.G. ). 5 - District Education Officer Surajpur, District- Surajpur ( C.G. ). 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Surajpur, District- Surajpur ( C.G. ). 7 - Block Education Officer Block Premnagar, District- Surajpur ( C.G. ). 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Premnagar, District- Surajpur ( C.G. ). 9 - Collector Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.). 10 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bhaiyathan, District- Surajpur ( C.G. ). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey and Mr. Mayur Khandelwal Panel Lawyers SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 07/10/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records related to the case of the petitioners from the possession of respondent for its kind consideration. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to 3 / 4 consider the case of the petitioners for grant of benefits of Kramonnati Vetanmaan/Time pay scale on completion of 10 years of services in light of the circular dated 10.03.2017 issued by the State Govt. and order passed by the Division bench in case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh order dated 28.02.2024. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to give all benefits of petitioners including the arrears of pay with 18% interest per annum from the date of completion of 10 years of services till the actual payment of Kramonnati Vetanmaan within the stipulated period of 30 days. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to disposed off the instant writ petition with similar order passed in the case of Smt. Sona Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 order passed on 28.02.2024. 10.5 That, any other relief may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit in facts and circumstances of the case. ” 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of first Kramonnati and second Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitled for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to concerned respondent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 4 / 4 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to the concerned respondent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the concerned respondent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the respondent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/-- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen