Surya v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/12241/2025 · 2025-04-23
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52001 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52001 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No. 12241 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.04.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.12241 of 2025 Surya ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State represented by Inspector of Police Kilpauk Police Station Chennai. (Crime No.15 of 2025) 2.Sandhiya ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records in Crime No.15 of 2025 dated 15.01.2025 pending investigation on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sachin Priya Daniel For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (crl.side) For R2 : Mr.G.Sathish Kumar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No. 12241 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.15 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent, registered for the offences under Sections 64, 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) of BNS and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. 2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No. 12241 of 2025 settlement between themselves. 4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,/Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the FIR in Crime No.15 of 2025 pending on the file of the first respondent. 5. In view of the above, the FIR in Crime No.15 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent, is hereby quashed.
The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees Five Thousand only) in total as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No. 12241 of 2025
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 23.04.2025 Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order shk To https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No. 12241 of 2025
1. Inspector of Police Kilpauk Police Station Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. shk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No. 12241 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.12241 of 2025 23.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis