APHC010417132023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21476/2023 Between: 1. NANDIPATI NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O OBULA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O H.NO.4-47, KOMATI VEEDHI BANDI ATMAKUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL NANDYAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDYAL TALUQ POLICE STATION NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. BOMMIREDDY TULASAMMA, W/O LATE B.PRATAP REDDY AGED ABOUT 58YRS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O H.NO.87/959-1, TELECOM NAGAR KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 in respect of the suit schedule property in 0.S.No.1/2023 and 3/2023 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal and insisting the petitioner to settle the civil dispute with the respondent No.5 and further threatening to irhplicate in false criminal cases as arbitrary, illegal, beyond jurisdiction and violation of Articles 14 86 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 and compel the petitioner to withdraw the suits in O.S.No.l/2023 and O.S.No.3/2023 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 in respect of the suit schedule property in O.S.No.1/2023 and O.S.No.3/2023 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. V NITESH The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21476 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 in respect of the suit schedule property in 0.S.No.1/2023 and 3/2023 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal and insisting the petitioner to settle the civil dispute with the respondent No.5 and further threatening to irhplicate in false criminal cases as arbitrary, illegal, beyond jurisdiction and violation of Articles 14 86 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere with the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.5 and compel the petitioner to withdraw the suits in O.S.No.l/2023 and O.S.No.3/2023 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal without following due process of law in the interest of justice.” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21476 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 289