VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/12569/2025 · 2026-04-08
Alka Sarin, To Be Nominated
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5200 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5200 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12569-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.04.2026 VINOD KUMAR AND ORS
…. Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
…. Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr. D.V. Dhindsa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Sr. DAG Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Chaman Deep, Advocate for respondent No.4.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
1.
Challenge in the present writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is to the notices dated 05.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) issued under Section 24(1) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and notices dated 05.04.2025 (Annexure P-8) issued under Section 24(2) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat states that the aforesaid notices would be withdrawn and that respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat would proceed in the matter as per the legal remedies available under The Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961.
AMAN JAIN 2026.04.09 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment
CWP-12569-2025 (O&M)
-2-
3.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.4-Gram Panchayat, the present writ petition has since been rendered infructuous and the same is disposed off as such. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
(ALKA SARIN)
JUDGE
(RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) 08.04.2026
JUDGE Aman Jain
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2026.04.09 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
order/judgment