Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 143 CRM-M-23097-2025 Date of decision: 30.04.2025 Vikram .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present : Ms. Pinki Mehla, Advocate for the petitioner. **** MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner in the instant (second) petition is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.178 dated 10.07.2024 under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 of the IPC (Sections 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC added lateron), registered at Police Station Kaithal, Sadar, District Kaithal.
2. At the outset, wheb a pointed query was put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether there had been any material change in circumstances subsequent to the dismissal of the petitioner's previous petition wherein similar relief had been sought, she was unable to bring to satisfy this Court qua any such material change in circumstances which would warrant accepting the prayer of the counsel for extending the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3. Dismissed. 30.04.2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Vinay JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VINAY 2025.04.30 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment