APHC010253842021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14611/2021 Between: 1. PULAGURTHA VENKATA LAKSHMI PRASANNA KUMARI, W/O. V.MADAN MOHAN RAO, HINDU, AGED 50 YEARS, PRACTICING ADVOCATE AND NOTARY, R/O.H.NO.9-216, KALIKRISHNA NAGAR, DOWLAISWARAM VILLAGE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 0/O.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. ADABALA SRINU, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DOWLAISWARAM POLICE STATION, DOWLAISWARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. PADALA NARAYANASWAMY, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DOWLAISWARAM POLICE STATION, DOWLAISWARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. GANESWARA RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DOWLAISWARAM POLICE STATION, DOWLAISWARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 6. DARA SITA, ASST.INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DOWLAISWARAM POLICE STATION, DOWLAISWARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus the inaction on the part of the 2nd Respondent in initiating proceedings pursuant to the complaint of the Petitioner dt.15.12.2020 against respondents 3 to 6 U/Sec.217 IPC and also Sec.3(2) (va) of SC 85 ST(POA) Act, 1989, is nothing but arbitrary, unreasonable, unlawful and against to the Fundamental Rights of the petitioner under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and by further consequently directing the respondent No.2 to initiate action upon the complaint of the Petitioner dt.15.12.2020 against respondents 3 to 6, as per law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus the inaction on the part of the 2nd Respondent in initiating proceedings pursuant to the complaint of the Petitioner dt.15.12.2020 against respondents 3 to 6 U/Sec 217 IPC and also Sec.3(2) (va) of SC & ST(POA) Act, 1989 is nothing but arbitrary, unreasonable, unlawful and against to the Fundamental Rights of the petitioner under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and by further consequently directing the respondent No.2 to initiate action upon the complaint of the Petitioner dt.15.12.2020 against respondents 3 to 6 as per law and pass...” 2. Heard Ms. P.V.S.Harika, learned counsel representing Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on oral instructions, would submit that Respondent No. 2 received the representation of the petitioner and forwarded the same to Respondent No. 3. Respondent No. 3 made several efforts to secure the presence of the petitioner to address the complaints, but the petitioner did not turn up. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025. SNI 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14611 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 SNI 105