Yerramsetty Rambabu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/26698/2021 · 2025-12-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51992 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51992 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010442762021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26698/2021 Between:
1. YERRAMSETTY RAMBABU, , S/O.YERRAMSETTY SESHU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC- PAINT WORKER, R/O. FLAT NO.GF4, 3-1- 217, PAVAN SAI APARTMENTS, B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BESIDE SITHARA THEATER, VIDHYADHARA PURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , BAVANIPURAM CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAIKAPURAM CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHAVANIPURAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PAIKAPURAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. YARRAMSETTY NAGA KRISHNA VENI, D/O. YERRAMSETTY
2
SESHU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. DO.NO.18-7-14/6, KHUDDUS NAGAR, NEAR LOCO SHED, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. YARRAMSETTY NAGESWARA RAO, , S/O. YERRAMSETTY SESHU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC- SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER, WORKING AT TELECOM OFFICE, NEAR TENALI RAILWAY STATION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BATHALA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“..to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 5th & 6th Respondents in interfering with the Civil disputes in respect of the property in Pavan Sai Apartment, Flat No.GF-4, Door No.1-217, Ambedkar Road, Ramarajya Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District, wherein the petitioner living along with mother, wife and children of him, and also calling the petitioner to the police station without any cause or registration of crime and made to sit in the police station as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to Article 14, 19 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.5 & 6 not to call the petitioner to their police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and made to sit in the police station and not to interfere with the Civil disputes in respect of above said property and pass...”
3
2.
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
Date: 09.12.2025 ASR
4
96 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.26698 of 2021
Dt..09.12.2025
ASR