1 APHC010042542021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2851/2021 Between: 1. BADAM NAGI REDDY,, S/O B. MOHAN REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL, RIO. H.NO.2-19, SOMIREDDY BAZAR, NEAR INNA REDDY RICE MILL, OLD TOWN, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. BADAM LINGA REDDY,, S/O. B. MOHAN REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL, RIO. H.NO.2-19, SOMIREDDY BAZAR, NEAR INNA REDDY RICE MILL, OLD TOWN, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GURAJALA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHARLA TOEN POLICE STATION, MACHERLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHERLA TOWN POLICE STATION, MACHERLAGUNTURL DISTRICT. 6. BADAM VASUDEVA REDDY, S/O. YALAMANDA REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. BADAM SURYA PRASADA REDDY, S/O. VEERENDRA REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, AGRICULTURE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 8. BADAM PRAMEELA, W/O. LATE. RAJASEKHAR REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, RIO. OLD TOWN, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. S DILIP JAYA RAM The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action respondents 4 and 5 in calling the petitioners to the police station and forcing the petitioners to enter into a compromise with respondents 6 to 8 in relation to a civil dispute which is pending as O.S. No. 201/2020 on the file of the Court The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Macherla filed by the petitioners and despite an injunction being granted in favor of the petitioners against the respondents 6 to 8 as bad, illegal, arbitrary vocative of articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to not to call the petitioners to the police station in relation to the subject matter of the Civil Suit O.S.No.201/2020, on the file of the Court of The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Macherla, and to pass such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Heard Sri V.S.K. Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S. Dilip Jay Ram, learned counsel for the unofficial respondents and Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on a complaint of one Smt. 3 Badam Prameela (unofficial respondent No.8 herein), the police have registered a case against the petitioners herein in Crime No.213 of 2020 of Macherla Town Police Station, Guntur Rural District, for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 354, 307, 420, 447 IPC and 156(3) Cr.P.C. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that except registering the crime, the petitioners were never called to the Police Station and never forced them to compromise with the unofficial respondents. 4. Recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.10.2025 Vns