RAMAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA AYATTI v. PHAKEERAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA AYATTI,
WP/103620/2024 · 2025-09-26
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51986 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 51986 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13558 WP No. 103620 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103620 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)
BETWEEN:
1. RAMAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA AYATTI, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICUTLURE, AT. ARALIKATTI, PRESENTLY RESIDING NO: HIREGUNJALA, TALUKA: KUNDAGOL, DIST: DHARWAD-581177.
2. ULAVAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA AYATTI, AGE: 72 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, AT: ARALIKATTI-581207, DIST: DHARWAD.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SACHIN C.ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PHAKEERAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA AYATTI, AGE: 75 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, AT. ARALIKATTI-587103.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13558 WP No. 103620 of 2024
2. CHANNAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA AYATTI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, AT. ARALIKATTI-587103.
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA JDLR, BELAGAVI.
4.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY. DDLR, DHARWAD.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRITE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION AND BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED.
15/02/2024 AND ORDER PASSED BY THE JDLR, BELAGAVI AND UPHELD THE LOWER TRAIL COURT ORDER DATED. 31/07/2023, IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE DDLR, DHARWAD, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13558 WP No. 103620 of 2024
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 09.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
GAB CT:VP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 37