IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40392 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2024 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1. Rajanti Devi S/O Babuchand Yadav Resident Of Village -Pakar ,Bigha, Ps- Hulasganj, Dist -Jehanabad 2. Beauty Devi W/o Ramsebak Yadav Resident Of Village -Pakar ,Bigha, Ps- Hulasganj, Dist -Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Advocate Ms. Kumari Anjani Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 15-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 308 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that on 08.11.2024, all the F.I.R. named accused persons came to his house and started abusing him. It is further alleged that they also started pelting stones towards him. It is also alleged that one Ramsevak Yadav assaulted him by means of iron rod and one Babuchand Yadav assaulted his sister by means of lathi. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40392 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2025 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the petitioners are quite innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case with a view to harass and demoralize the petitioners due to previous enmity and land dispute. All the allegations against the petitioners are false, fabricated and concocted, there is no legal evidence whatsoever against the petitioner. Petitioner and informant both are next door neighbour and own agnates, there is some previous land dispute between both the parties. 5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 6. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between both the parties. Both the petitioners are lady having no criminal antecedent. From perusal of F.I.R., it appears that there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners of brick batting. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehandabad, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40392 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2025 3/3 in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 308 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., as also with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner. (ii) if the petitioner tampers with the evidence or threatens the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iii) In case, the petitioner repeats offence of similar nature after enlargement on bail, his bail bonds may be cancelled by the learned trial Court. Ankit Kumar/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U T