Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 51985 (CHH)

PARAGA BAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/376/2024 · 2025-11-11

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55066-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 376 of 2024 1. Paraga Bai D/o Late Jagannath Sahu Aged About 75 Years R/o Jewra Sirsa, P.S. - Pulgaon, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. Kanshi @ Keshar Bai W/o Kuleshwar Sahu Aged About 55 Years R/o Marka, Post Andhiyar, P.S. - Navagarh, District - Bermetara, Chhattisgarh. 3. Uttara Devi W/o Gyneshwar Sahu Aged About 58 Years R/o L-9, Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4. Amalika Sahu W/o Tameshwar Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Bohardih, Post Santra, P.S. Utai, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5. Poonamchand Sahu S/o Jagannath Sahu Aged About 51 Years R/o Village Jewra, P.S. Pulgaon, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Durg, Dist - Durg, Chhattisgarh, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2. Phoolchand Nagrare S/o Shri B.R. Nagrare Aged About 52 Years R/o Camp -2, Baikuntth Nagar, P.S. Chawani, Bhilai, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.11.13 10:28:33 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 12 .11.2025 1. Heard Mr. T.K. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No.1/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash and set aside the FIR No. 1442 of 2022 (Annexure P/2) registered at City Kotwali, Durg and further proceedings based on the same qua against the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition, as the charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioners before the competent Court, the learned trial Court has framed charges against them, and the trial is presently at the stage of evidence. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to the same. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty 3 to the petitioners to approach this Court afresh, if any further cause of action arises. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan