APHC010655102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34054/2025 Between: 1. SMT. S JAMILA, W/O EDIGA MOULALI SWAMI, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. CHINARAJUPALEM VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, 518124 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT, NANDYALA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANAGPALLI POLICE STATION, NANDYALA DISTRICT. 4. YERASU RAJASEKHAR REDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, H.NO.8-278, BANAGANAPALLI VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLI MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 518124. 5. VASAGIRI NAGENDRA, S/O NAGANDRA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC EXERCISE CONSTABLE PLOT NO. 76, SUGALI METTA (V) NEAR SRINANDHI FORTUNED NANDYALA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, NEAR MAHANANDI ROAD, ANDHRA PRADESH .518501. 6. YERASU PARTHA SARATHI REDDY, S/O VENKATA SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC STATE BANK MANAGER, H.NO. 8- 278 BANAGANAPALLI, NANDYALA MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 518124. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent/SHO in not registering FIR in spite of the written complaint dt.09.06.2025 against the unofficial Respondents fraudulent action of the registration of my family property by way of misleading with cheating and dishonest intention ,with collusion by the unofficial respondents even the subject property was registered in favour of the unofficial respondent in Sy.No 16-1 admeasuring Ac. 1-25 cents, situated at Gulamalia Baadhu village, Banaganapalli Mandal, Nandhyala District , as illegal, arbitrary, against the Provisions of BNS Act and also against all settle principles of law and consequently direct the Respondents police to consider his representation by way of register an FIR against the unofficial Respondents based on the complaint dt.09.06.2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the Respondents police to consider his representation by way of registering FIR against the unofficial Respondents based on the complaint dt.09.06.2025, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34054 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent/SHO in not registering FIR in spite of the written complaint dt.09.06.2025 against the unofficial Respondents fraudulent action of the registration of my family property by way of misleading with cheating and dishonest intention ,with collusion by the unofficial respondents even the subject property was registered in favour of the unofficial respondent in Sy.No 16-1 admeasuring Ac. 1-25 cents, situated at Gulamalia Baadhu village, Banaganapalli Mandal, Nandhyala District , as illegal, arbitrary, against the Provisions of BNS Act and also against all settle principles of law and consequently direct the Respondents police to consider his representation by way of register an FIR against the unofficial Respondents based on the complaint dt.09.06.2025 and to pass.…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that the police have conducted a preliminary enquiry pursuant to the complaint made by the petitioner and came to conclusion that the subject matter is purely civil in nature. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout her remedy before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.34054 of 2025 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 270